Resources on open science

general
information
open
access
open tools,
methods & data
open
peer-review
open research
assessment

General information on open science

Links

Suggested readings

  • Appel, Andre Luiz, Sarita Albagli, and Maria Lucia MacIel. 2018. “Open Scientific Journals: Emerging Practices and Approaches.” Information Services and Use 37 (4): 475–88. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-170862
  • Banks, George C., James G. Field, Frederick L. Oswald, Ernest H. O’Boyle, Ronald S. Landis, Deborah E. Rupp, and Steven G. Rogelberg. 2019. “Answers to 18 Questions About Open Science Practices.” Journal of Business and Psychology 34 (3): 257–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9547-8
  • Bartling, Sönke, and Sascha Friesike. 2014. “Towards Another Scientific Revolution.” In Opening Science, edited by Sönke Bartling and Sascha Friesike, 3–15. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8
  • Biswas-diener, Robert. 2017. Open: The Philosophy and Practices That Are Revolutionizing Education and Science. Edited by Rajiv S. Jhangiani and Robert Biswas-Diener. Open: The Philosophy and Practices That Are Revolutionizing Education and Science. Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/bbc
  • Bowman, Nicholas David, and Justin Robert Keene. 2018. “A Layered Framework for Considering Open Science Practices.” Communication Research Reports 35 (4): 363–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2018.1513273
  • Burgelman, Jean-Claude, Corina Pascu, Katarzyna Szkuta, Rene Von Schomberg, Athanasios Karalopoulos, Konstantinos Repanas, and Michel Schouppe. 2019. “Open Science, Open Data, and Open Scholarship: European Policies to Make Science Fit for the Twenty-First Century.” Frontiers in Big Data 2 (December): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00043
  • Eisfeld-reschke, Jörg, Ulrich Herb, Karsten Wenzlaff, and George Lois. 2014. “Research Funding in Open Science.” In Opening Science, 237–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8
  • Fecher, Benedikt, and Sascha Friesike. 2014. Opening Science. Edited by Sönke Bartling and Sascha Friesike. Opening Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8
  • Fries, Tobias. 2014. “The Social Factor of Open Science.” In Opening Science, 271–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8
  • Nosek, B. A., G. Alter, G. C. Banks, D. Borsboom, S. D. Bowman, S. J. Breckler, S. Buck, et al. 2015. “Promoting an Open Research Culture.” Science 348 (6242): 1422–25. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374
  • Olalla-Soler, Christian. 2021. “Yes! We’re open. Open science and the future of academic practices in translation and interpreting studies.” Translation & Interpreting 13 (2): 1-28. https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.113202.2021.a01
  • Sidler, Michelle. 2014. “Open Science and the Three Cultures: Expanding Open Science to All Domains of Knowledge Creation.” In Opening Science, edited by Sönke Bartling and Sascha Friesike, 81–85. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8

Resources on open access

Links

Suggested readings

  • Eve, Martin Paul. 2015. “Co-Operating for Gold Open Access without APCs.” Insights 28 (1): 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.166
  • Franco Aixelá, Javier, Christian Olalla-Soler, and Sara Rovira-Esteva. 2021. “Open Access in Translation Studies: A Bibliometric Overview of Its Distribution and Development.” Translation and Interpreting 13 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.113201.2021.a01
  • Morrison, Heather. 2018. “Global OA APCs (APC) 2010-2017: Major Trends.” In 22nd International Conference on Electronic Publishing. OpenEdition Press. https://doi.org/10.4000/proceedings.elpub.2018.16
  • Piwowar, Heather, Jason Priem, Vincent Larivière, Juan Pablo Alperin, Lisa Matthias, Bree Norlander, Ashley Farley, Jevin West, and Stefanie Haustein. 2018. “The State of OA: A Large-Scale Analysis of the Prevalence and Impact of Open Access Articles.” PeerJ 6 (February): e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375

Resources on open methods, tools, and data

Links

Suggested readings

  • Aczel, Balazs, Barnabas Szaszi, Alexandra Sarafoglou, Zoltan Kekecs, Šimon Kucharský, Daniel Benjamin, Christopher D. Chambers, et al. 2020. “A Consensus-Based Transparency Checklist.” Nature Human Behaviour 4 (1): 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6
  • Gewin, Virginia. 2016. “An Open Mind on Open Data.” Nature 529 (7584): 117–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/NJ7584-117A
  • Grahe, Jon. 2018. “Another Step towards Scientific Transparency: Requiring Research Materials for Publication.” Journal of Social Psychology 158 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1416272
  • Hardwicke, Tom E., Maya B. Mathur, Kyle MacDonald, Gustav Nilsonne, George C. Banks, Mallory C. Kidwell, Alicia Hofelich Mohr, et al. 2018. “Data Availability, Reusability, and Analytic Reproducibility: Evaluating the Impact of a Mandatory Open Data Policy at the Journal Cognition.” Royal Society Open Science 5 (8). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180448
  • Mellinger, Christopher D., and Thomas A. Hanson. 2020. “Meta-Analysis and Replication in Interpreting Studies.” Interpreting 22 (1): 140–49. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00037.mel
  • Miguel, E., C. Camerer, K. Casey, J. Cohen, K. M. Esterling, A. Gerber, R. Glennerster, et al. 2014. “Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research.” Science 343 (6166): 30–31. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1245317
  • Nosek, Brian A., Charles R. Ebersole, Alexander C. DeHaven, and David T. Mellor. 2018. “The Preregistration Revolution.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115 (11): 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114
  • Olalla-Soler, Christian. 2020. “Practices and Attitudes toward Replication in Empirical Translation and Interpreting Studies.” Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 32 (1): 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.18159.ola
  • Phillips, Mark, and Bartha M. Knoppers. 2019. “Whose Commons? Data Protection as a Legal Limit of Open Science.” Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (1): 106–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110519840489

Resources on open peer-review

Suggested readings

  • Ford, Emily. 2013. “Defining and Characterizing Open Peer Review: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Scholarly Publishing 44 (4): 311–26. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.44-4-001
  • Hopewell, Sally, Gary S. Collins, Isabelle Boutron, Ly Mee Yu, Jonathan Cook, Milensu Shanyinde, Rose Wharton, Larissa Shamseer, and Douglas G. Altman. 2014. “Impact of Peer Review on Reports of Randomised Trials Published in Open Peer Review Journals: Retrospective before and after Study.” BMJ (Online) 349 (July): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4145
  • Morey, Richard D., Christopher D. Chambers, Peter J. Etchells, Christine R. Harris, Rink Hoekstra, Daniël Lakens, Stephan Lewandowsky, et al. 2016. “The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: Incentivizing Open Research Practices through Peer Review.” Royal Society Open Science 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547
  • Pöschl, Ulrich. 2012. “Multi-Stage Open Peer Review: Scientific Evaluation Integrating the Strengths of Traditional Peer Review with the Virtues of Transparency and Self-Regulation.” Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 6 (JUL): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00033
  • Ross-Hellauer, Tony, Arvid Deppe, and Birgit Schmidt. 2017. “Survey on Open Peer Review: Attitudes and Experience amongst Editors, Authors and Reviewers.” PLoS ONE 12 (12): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189311
  • Ross-Hellauer, Tony. 2017. “What Is Open Peer Review? A Systematic Review.” F1000Research 6 (1): 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.1

Resources on open research assessment

Links

Suggested readings

  • Binswanger, Mathias. 2014. “Excellence by Nonsense: The Competition for Publications in Modern Science.” In Opening Science, edited by Sönke Bartling and Sascha Friesike, 49–72. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8
  • Fenner, Martin. 2014. “Altmetrics and Other Novel Measures for Scientific Impact.” In Opening Science, 179–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8
  • Nentwich, Michael, and René König. 2014. “Academia Goes Facebook? The Potential of Social Network Sites in the Scholarly Realm.” In Opening Science, edited by Sönke Bartling and Sascha Friesike, 107–24. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8
  • Priem, Jason, Dario Taraborelli, Paul Groth, and Cameron Neylon. 2010. “Altmetrics: A Manifesto.” 2010. xhttp://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.
  • Skinner, Nicole, Lucía Sapiña, and Manuel Gil. 2014. “On Open Access, Impact Factors and Boycotting the Top Science Journals: An Interview with Randy Schekman.” Contributions to Science 79 (June): 73–79. https://doi.org/10.2436/cs.v10i1.136957

Updated: July 22, 2021